1. We do not know about Godse as he was demonised and even stupid acts of Gandhi were made heroic. As far as Gandhi is concerned I would like to quote PM of England at the time of freedom. When asked the role of Gandhi in India’s freedom, he simply said “MINIMAL”. India’s freedom was more of economic and military considerations than Gandhi’s non violence.
2. Sarojani Naidu pointed out that “Gandhi is a poor whose poverty cost a fortune to India.” Everyone says Gandhi traveled third class, but that third class was always emptied for Gandhi. No fellow travellor in his coaches.
3. Non violence has never won a war, nor will it ever. History stands testimony to it. While Godse’s act was criminal in nature, greater good must also be taken into account. What Netaji did did makes Gandhi’s deeds any less evil. In politics, there is no good or evil, only interests.
4. If there be bloodshed, at least it must be bilateral. I see no point in seeing fellow men fall just for sake of non violence. And only answer to violence is counter violence.
5. Of course he succeeded in uniting India, but failed to get optimal mileage out of it.
6. What made Jinnah capable of blackmailing? Gandhi’s tendency to appease muslims. Even if partition was inevitable, it could b carried out with minimal blood shed just be means of counter violence, not by asking Hindus to surrender.
7. Hypothetical question.
8. Only thing I agree with you. We can not call him corrupt, at least not in material sense.
9. Killing politicians is not a feasible solution just because we live in a free nation where we do have right to vote and avoid corruption. To this we are rsponsible ourselves. In his ime, power was in foreign hands which never heard our justified demands.
10. Being a Hindu and supporting it should not be a crime as it seems to be in India. It might have clouded the judgement of a stupid, not that of a person capable of logical reasoning, that Godse definitely exhibited. Further when you go out to pakistan or somewhere else on a theatrical tour things are much different than ground realities. Terrorism is not a crime syndicate, it is a mentality.
11. Again a hypothetical situation. No one is going to kill you just for feeding an animal. But the killing would be worth if you snatch food from human to feed animals.
Finally only those people switch to abuses who have no capability of sensible argument. Regarding acting like Godse, we do not have a definite enemy.
Regards
Rajeev

Above is a link to Godse’s final speech in court. Whoever disagree’s with Godse’s actions will rethink after hearing some select passages from his speech. I wish Godse would not have stopped at Gandhi but gone and killed the Nehrus too.